Scientists are Watch Mound Daughtertaking a cue from last week's Women's Marches and planning their own protests in Washington, D.C., and far beyond.
Frustrated and alarmed by what they said were President Donald Trump's "clear anti-science actions," march organizers told Mashable they hoped to bring together people from across the political spectrum to stand up for scientific progress.
"This is not a partisan issue," the March for Science team said by email. "Scientific research moves us forward."
SEE ALSO: Government scientists are caught between new gag order and their own ethics policiesOrganizers haven't yet picked a date for the D.C. demonstration. But a planning team is meeting on Saturday to develop a firmer mission statement and ensure the movement is "inclusive of all people (and all fields of science)," they said.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Separately, environmental and climate groups are planning a People's Climate March in April to protest Trump's plans to scrap former President Barack Obama's climate policies and advance construction of controversial oil pipelines.
Both climate activists and scientists said they were bolstered by the Women's Marches, which drew millions of women and men around the world, from Washington down to Antarctica.
Next to signs promoting women's reproductive rights and dismissing Trump's past xenophobic and misogynistic statements, many demonstrators carried posters urging participants to "Stand Up for Science" or declaring that "Climate Change is Real" -- a fact that Trump said he doesn't fully accept.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Amid those events, several scientists were talking on Reddit last weekend about how they could respond to an administration that has vowed to scrap environmental and climate change programs and is generally hostile to science.
A participant suggested scientists hold their own march, and the idea quickly snowballed. Scientists and concerned civilians alike have since shown an outpouring of support.
The March for Science's private Facebook group, which started with just a couple hundred members last week, had nearly 263,000 members as of Wednesday afternoon. Its related Twitter account, @ScienceMarchDC, was up to 47,000 followers. A public group, meanwhile, has 35,000 followers.
The numbers ratcheted up in recent days after the Trump administration took steps to silence arms of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Officials also froze the EPA's environmental grants and contracts, and this week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention abruptly canceled a major climate change conference planned for February.
On Tuesday, Trump signed an executive action to revive the Keystone XL pipeline, which the Obama administration rejected in 2015 on the grounds of climate change. He also signed an action to help Energy Transfer Partners complete its Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.
Environmentalists on Wednesday vowed to double down their opposition to those pipelines with the People's Climate March -- slated for April 29 in Washington -- and other related actions across the country.
"Our planet is in crisis, and voices from around the nation must and will be heard," Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said in a statement.
If you are a scientist who is worried about your research during the Trump administration, please send an email from your personalaccountto [email protected].
Topics Donald Trump
The Founding Farmers by Robin BellingerTwincest; Girls on Film by Lorin SteinLoose Lips by Laura MoserAnnouncing Issue 200! by Sadie SteinLamb Chop in Search of a Martini by Matt WeinstockThe Tyranny of Footnotes by Paul WachterLoose Lips by Laura MoserEzra Pound’s “Exile’s Letter” by Edmund WhiteThe Fetish by Vanessa BlakesleeThe Founding Farmers by Robin BellingerA Panorama of ‘Middlemarch’The Topographical Soul by Thomas BellerStaff Picks: Keith Haring’s Journals, ‘Library’ by The Paris ReviewJohn Berryman’s “Dream Song #14” by Jana PrikrylAlexander Pope’s “The Rape of the Lock” by Angus TrumbleLeanne Shapton by Thessaly La ForceThe Animal Mummies Wish to Thank the Following by Ramona AusubelJoin Us for Our 2012 Spring Revel by Sadie SteinAlan Bennett on ‘Smut’ by Jonathan GharraieAnnouncing Issue 200! by Sadie Stein Brenda Romero's 'Empire of Sin' takes strategy to 1920s Chicago gangs Facebook's crypto plan is already influencing the most powerful banks Happy birthday, Captain America. And happy Fourth of July. Anchorage roasts as heat records break across Alaska Nike pulls 'Betsy Ross flag' shoes after Colin Kaepernick said they were offensive This sneaky kitten is a terrible and adorable little stalker 'Bond 25' filming kicks off in London This musical remix of the UK news in 2016 is hilariously brutal How to cope when a friendship ends 'Stranger Things' Season 3 first reactions are here. Brace yourself. Airbnb CEO teases updates for 2017 on Twitter This millennial's relatable tweet about time is blowing people's minds Carpool Karaoke has a special connection to George Michael How the cast of 'Stranger Things' says you should watch Season 3 We need to talk about EDITH in 'Spider Ridiculous Fox anchor to Teen Vogue writer: 'stick to the thigh Betty White is trending on Twitter but don't worry, it's not what you think Apple is reportedly working on a new keyboard for future MacBooks OK, calling it: This little boy stars in 2016's most heartwarming Christmas video Here are the best books of 2019 so far, according to Amazon
2.3031s , 8225.8984375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch Mound Daughter】,Exquisite Information Network