For way too long,Discuss Section people have played menstruation for laughs. These hilariousjokes usually come back to a familiar punch line: Women just can't function when they bleed.
It's not just a joke, either. That trope has been used by men and women alike to justify why we can't have nice things, including a female president.
SEE ALSO: Yogi dressed in white powerfully defies period shame on InstagramBut a new study published Tuesday in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscienceoffers some quality research to destroy the myth of the woman turned incompetent by her period.
The study took dozens of women and tested their cognitive abilities several times over the course of two consecutive menstrual cycles. The researchers found no consistent associations between fluctuations to the women's hormones and their cognition.
"I think this research shows very clearly that women function very well despite having hormonal changes."
"I think this research shows very clearly that women function very well despite having hormonal changes," says Brigitte Leeners, the study's lead author and a professor in the Clinic for Reproductive Endocrinology at the University Hospital Zurich. "You cannot use hormonal changes as an excuse that there would be limitations in their performance."
Someone might want to alert Donald Trump, given his interest in women and how they bleed. Last year, he quipped that former Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly got upset while moderating a presidential debate and had "blood coming out of her wherever." He denied the comment referenced her period, but it was hard not to see the connection.
Though previous research has suggested that estrogen and progesterone, both female sex hormones, may affect a woman's cognitive functioning, Leeners says past studies had significant limitations and methodological biases. For instance, none of them measured hormonal levels and cognition over the course of two periods, which would help establish a causal relationship between hormones and ability.
Leeners' team actually did initially see decreases in cognition during the first menstrual cycle. But when they performed the same tests for attention span, working memory, and cognitive bias during the second round, those effects disappeared. She believes the initial observation could've captured false positives caused by random variation. The difference between the first and second cycles could also reflect something called "practice effects." Basically, the women may have know the tasks from before and got better at answering correctly.
The researchers also compared the participants' performance to one another as well as analyzing it over time for each person, and they found no difference.
Via GiphyNot testing women for consecutive periods may seem like a glaring oversight, but Leeners says there's a practical reason for it.
"If other research teams have limited resources, you’re quite tempted to do one cycle," she says. "And if you discover something significant, this is always nice to publish."
Participants in Leeners' study were paid 500 Euros each for extensive hormone measurements and comprehensive cognitive testing four times during each menstrual cycle. Sixty-eight women completed both the first and second rounds, and it's easy to see how the experiment would quickly get costly in both paying the subjects and researchers. Prior studies used much smaller sample sizes — some had fewer than 10 participants.
Leeners wants to see more rigorous studies on this subject, but her findings do line up with recent research showing the associations between hormone levels and cognition don't exist or are inconsistent. Plenty of women the world over could have told you that, but sometimes it takes science to help destroy a myth as powerful as this one.
Topics Gender Health Social Good
Kindergarteners are inspired by 'Wonder Woman' and it's adorableKaty Perry and Lady Gaga shared a touching moment after Hillary lost the electionThis SpiderDirectors threw a fit over 'clean' movie versions, and Sony listenedFacebook vows to fight terrorism with new algorithms and artificial intelligenceMashReads Podcast: A love letter to fantasy readers from one of their own, Laini TaylorAmazon's magic Dash Wand uses Alexa to keep you buying everythingFacebook is about to look like a Hallmark store explodedWahed Invest promises to be the first ShariaNancy Pelosi trolled Trump with this offer to the Golden State WarriorsWoman discovers very nasty surprise in her orange juice cartonYoko Ono will receive songwriting credit on John Lennon's 'Imagine'Google's likely ditching HTC for LG when it comes to the next PixelThe iPhone almost looked completely different, and, well, it's not goodTwitter just changed almost every part of its iOS appKindergarteners are inspired by 'Wonder Woman' and it's adorableLive out your true aquatic destiny at this mermaid cafeDetermined teen takes her exams even after deadly London fire destroys her homeAn AI just beat 'Ms. Pac9 things Kim Jong Tonight: Rowan Ricardo Phillips at McNally Jackson The Lights Dim at La Pagode, One of Paris’s Best Cinemas Some Are More Human Than Others: Stevie Smith’s Sketches Scary Stories Are Meant to Be Read Aloud How Terrifying a Ship on Fire Is—Robert Walser on Shipwrecks Poem: Craig Arnold, “For a Cook” (1997) Saturday: See Lorin Stein Discuss “Narcissus and Literature” I Thought My Dad Had No More Secrets to Tell, But... Watch the 1972 Movie of “Play It As It Lays” in Full The Other Paris: An Interview with Luc Sante Young Artists: No Social Media Following? Just Buy One. Pairing Artists with Corporations: Los Angeles in the Sixties Listen to a William Carlos Williams Radio Interview from 1950 Why “The Ambitious Guest” Is Hawthorne’s Scariest Story So, This Barack Obama Fellow Interviewed Marilynne Robinson... W. Eugene Smith’s Obsessive, Quixotic Documentary Work The Bodleian Has a Rediscovered Poem by Percy Shelley Spooky Staff Picks: What to See and Read on Halloween “Paint to End Painting”: A Look at Brice Marden’s Notebooks Staff Picks: Marcus, MacFarquhar, Ben Franklin
2.6351s , 10132.5546875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Discuss Section】,Exquisite Information Network