If you took a big sip of coffee on Dear Utol (2025): Kilay is Life Episode 42Wednesday and tried to dive down a Wikipedia rabbit hole, you may now have a wet screen, because get this: Wikipedia looks different.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Perhaps your brain rejected all the new white space, or the way the "sticky" new table of contents hovers while you scroll. But also maybe you just hate change.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
There's no right way to react to a thing happening on the internet, so whining and nitpicking, along with inexplicable fear, are to be expected at a time like this.
However, according to Annie Rauwerda, the Wikipedia editor and superfan behind the Twitter account Depths of Wikipedia, the update, called "Vector 2022," was in the works for a long time, and had been discussed nearly to death before the changes were rolled out. "Wikipedians have spilled more than 200,000 words on the page for Vector 2022 feedback," Rauwerda wrote in Slate. That word count means, she notes, "There’s a corpus longer than Jane Eyre(and almost as long as Moby-Dick) about button positioning and table formatting."
But nothing has fundamentally changed. The links you're used to seeing in a long, exhaustive sidebar on the left — y'know, "Main page," "Contents" "Current events" "Random article," and the rest — are still there. You just have to click the little double carrot icon in the top left corner to bring them back.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And once you get used to the new maximum line width, users of monitors with high resolutions might appreciate not having to read single lines of text as long as the entire Gettysburg Address.
But according to Rauwerda, the new design has already seen a substantial backlash, and it's only been one day. Swahili-language Wikipedians held a unanimous vote, according to her Slate article, and officially requested that the changes be reverted. And in a wider vote about whether the new version should be the default, true democracy does not appear to be in evidence, since "the 165 people who voted to oppose the redesign outnumbered the 153 supporters."
So if this gets you fired up, and you just need the old Wikipedia back, well, join one of the long, long, discussion threads about that. Or, since this isWikipedia after all, just customize your experience, and leave the Wikipedians to their weirdly aggressive arguments about steam engines.
The internet wants the royal baby to become king for a 'Jungle Book' related reasonNavel stones to ingrown toenails: Can you handle YouTube's grossest videos?7 year old who wants to watch dog videos cleverly made her own cardboard computerAnnounce your *real* genetic makeup with the 23andMe memeThe internet wants the royal baby to become king for a 'Jungle Book' related reasonHere's what happened when Trump asked Bill Gates to be his science advisorGoogle's first VR Doodle celebrates French film legend Georges MélièsTrump faces defamation charge from Stormy Daniels over "con job" tweetAdam McKay's 'Don't Look Up' is a fatalistic bummer: Netflix ReviewThe best TV episodes of 2021Tesla lawsuit alleges disturbing sexual harassment at Fremont factoryWas your iPhone repaired with official parts? New iOS update will tell you.'SpiderA stuffed anteater just took down the winner of a wildlife photography competitionMeta's VRChat clone, Horizon Worlds, launches for all adult users on Quest 2Instagram is working on bringing back the chronological timelineSean Baker's 'Red Rocket' is a bait and switch, but in a brilliant wayParents surprise FaceTime friends with their first meeting, and it's too muchThe bizarre story of an 'iCarly' fan account that's hassling celebrities on TwitterHow to post Live Photos on Instagram How I Began to Write by Gabriel García Márquez Soon by Jill Talbot Redux: The Geography of Self and Soul by The Paris Review Poetry Rx: Still, Somehow, We Breathe by Sarah Kay A Poet’s Complaints Against Fiction by Anthony Madrid Chantal Joffe’s Many Faces by Olivia Laing What We Saw When We First Saw the Wu Staff Picks: Moscow, Misunderstandings, and Money Mark by The Paris Review Staff Picks: Features, Films, and Flicks by The Paris Review Isaac Bashevis Singer from Beyond the Grave by Matt Levin The Ragpicker: Frédéric Pajak’s ‘Uncertain Manifesto’ The Joys of ‘Breaking and Entering’ Nudes by The Paris Review T. S. Eliot’s “The Cultivation of Christmas Trees” by Casey N. Cep Staff Picks: Spells, Cephalopods, and Smug Salads by The Paris Review Poetry Rx: There Are Enough Ballrooms in You by Sarah Kay Dressing for Others: Lawrence of Arabia’s Sartorial Statements by Isabella Hammad Cooking with Anzia Yezierska by Valerie Stivers Staff Picks: Peasants, Postpartum, and Palestine by The Paris Review Redux: There’s No Trouble in Sleeping by The Paris Review
2.0893s , 10109.71875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Dear Utol (2025): Kilay is Life Episode 42】,Exquisite Information Network