The Submission Season 1 Episode 1 (2016)specificity of Donald Trump Jr.'s email chain is what makes it so damning.
On Tuesday, the oldest son of the president published emails (obtained beforehand by The New York Times) in which he wrote to a friend who was serving as liaison between the Trump campaign and a Russian lawyer with connections to the Russian government. The emails show Trump Jr. had reason to believe he was being offered Moscow's help to get his father into the White House in 2016, and he responded to that information by writing, "if it's what you say I love it..."
SEE ALSO: Emoji sheriffs are patrolling TwitterEmail is a medium that lends itself to this kind of specificity. As Farhad Manjoo of The New York Timesrecently wrote, "It preserves time, location and state of mind." For all of email's issues, this may prove to be a great thing for the future integrity of American democracy. But as messaging platforms such as Slack slowly eat away at email's dominance in the field of professional correspondence, that specificity may not be something we enjoy for much longer. What happens when, perhaps sooner than we think, the next text-based scandal breaks and leaves Americans deciphering a slew of Slack messages full of emoji? What if, instead of writing, "I love it," Trump Jr. had just responded with a heart? How would Americans interpret that?
In fact, this type of situation has already gone to court. In early 2015 in New York City, police went to court with a teenager over the meaning of the gun emoji. The 17-year-old had posted Facebook statuses with a gun emoji pointed at an emoji of a police officer, and the NYPD initially charged him with making terroristic threats. The teenager's lawyer called the charge irrational, and the debate hinged on whether the kid had made a "true threat" or was perhaps just angrily tapping out some little pictures.
If the current political climate of America tells us anything, it should be that a consensus on emoji interpretation is unlikely.
The difference between guilt and innocence in leaks of future potentially incriminating documents could come down to a similar debate over interpretation.
"If [Trump Jr.] would have just put a bunch of very happy sounding emojis, how would it have gone in The New York Times?" said Bradley Shear, a lawyer with expertise in social media law. "I mean, what would they have said? That's the big question."
Shear thinks we'll have to figure out "what things mean" as a society. How do we interpret a heart emoji? A gun emoji? A smiley face? If Trump Jr. had responded to the news of possible Russian government assistance with a champagne bottle emoji, is that definitively positive? Somehow sarcastic?
If the current political climate of America tells us anything, it should be that a consensus on emoji interpretation is unlikely. That means any important interpretation will probably be left up to whoever is presiding over the meaning of an emoji or two in court.
"Pictures and emoticons, they mean something slightly different depending on who's using them," Shear said. "It will come down to the interpretation of the fact finder, whether it's a judge or a jury."
Topics Politics
Apple might give us a hardware surprise in time for ChristmasApple launches AirPods Max headphones and they are not cheapIf talking to your racist friends and family has been impossible, try this insteadVery good businessman President Trump uses Texas tragedy to show off his crappy merchTikTok is reportedly testing longer videosKurt Russell's jazzy Santa is the best part of Christmas Chronicles 2The Kardashians step up to the plate and contribute to Hurricane Harvey relief effortsApple gives older iPhones the gift of FaceTime HDThe iPhone/Android COVID contact tracing app is here for CaliforniansIs your iPhone draining battery fast after iOS 14.2? You're not alone.Yet another monolith has appeared on a beach in EnglandNew Australian proFirst reaction to "Wonder Woman 1984": Wonderful, hopeful, originalAurora acquires Uber's selfBeloved author Terry Pratchett's dying wish to steamroll his hard drive fulfilledHave an iPhone 11? Apple might owe you a free screen replacement.The internet roasts the New York Times Opinion section with memesSamsung laughed at Apple for ditching phone chargers. Now, it might do the same.The internet roasts the New York Times Opinion section with memes'The Mandalorian' Chapter 14 is an emotional rollercoaster Pokémon Go maker Niantic valued at $4 billion after $245 million round 19 times the Hillary shimmy GIF perfectly describes what you're going through Etsy proposes 3 ways to improve the gig economy in new report 'Ghostbusters' sequel coming in 2020, watch the spine Trump scored the debate's most retweeted tweet with a 2012 climate theory Hillary Clinton's debate night is off to a rocky start with a typo Sad dog just misses his humans 'Star Trek: Discovery' is starting to look a lot like Star Wars Comfort bingeing TV shows is one of life's more transcendent pleasures Google Maps wants to help you avoid that speeding ticket #UnlikelyDebateGuests highlights people we only wish could be at the presidential debate UberEats is going global, expanding into 22 more countries Cookie decorating videos show off the most relaxing culinary art form No amount of dressing can save Donald Trump's debate word salad Impromptu speed spelling is actually hilarious Justin Theroux responds to Jennifer Aniston getting yanked into the Brangelina divorce #TrumpWon trends in the morning after the debate — with plenty of laughter Verizon extends free Apple Music subscription for some Unlimited plans indefinitely Elon Musk makes it more expensive to own a Tesla Facebook promises $300 million to help local news
2.0317s , 10133.65625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Submission Season 1 Episode 1 (2016)】,Exquisite Information Network